Friday, 27 March 2020
Revelation
And now a day at at time and plenty of jokes. A sickness is everywhere. I've seen it in the shape of a graph and a plain x-ray film showing bilateral pneumonia with a predominant basal distribution. I'm guessing 280,000,000 dead from this one now. Good times.
Monday, 14 October 2019
Big and Clever
Long since it was last updated the dead blog gasped unexpectedly and clawed at the clay entombing it. Nothing to say with years of clod clogging its maw and no desire to clear it. Volition eroded and truly lacking meaning, want or speech. Short years all, changes within them sapping thought and energy.
Look back and see the corpses you have left of yourself.
(Exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
Look back and see the corpses you have left of yourself.
(Exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
‘he vowed revenge with oaths and hyperboles’)
The future is a week, it lasts no longer than that other than resetting and becoming the future anew each time. There aren't any jokes this time. It's a disappointment to me.
(Excessive, self-absorbed unhappiness over ones own troubles.
‘he seems to be wallowing in self-pity’
‘I'm feeling deeply ashamed for having given way to despair and self-pity’)
Friday, 23 September 2016
Sci Fi Fiction on a par with Arhur C Clarke. HELL YEAH!
Gravity fell
from the sky, crystalline shards of light orbited. Somewhere under the main
deck a sickening groan was heard, like the death throe of some colossus, a
dying whale. First officer Aastrand Grimnes scanned her instrument panel, the
gyroscopes and internal stability indicators dancing madly before her eyes.
Grimnes was a veteran of wormhole transit but the process never failed to
unnerve her. Too many times had she heard tales of vessels straying too close
to the event horizon, of poorly maintained vessels developing fatal stress fractures
in their hulls, of crews found madly tearing at one another after perfect
transits, their ships hanging aimlessly in space, drifting. Too many times had
she seen near misses first hand.
A single warning indicator began flashing a sickly sodium alert to her
right accompanied by the tinny, electronic hazard indication clacson. The aging
computer mainframe was overloading. Judging the situation with usual alacrity
Grimnes quickly shut off power to the now none essential triaxial stability
system. There would be no planes of x, y or z soon and the wormhole would be
doing the work in any case.
As she had done countless time before, Grimnes swore that this would be
her last transit. To hell with the fact that she would never be able to return,
she would find a new life and make of it what she could. Transiting specialists
and colonists, wool and wood to these outposts reaped billions for her
employers but all she saw was risk and time wasted. This work had a shelf life
and she felt that she had been pushing her luck for some time. When she noticed
the overhead diagnostic displays folding in on themselves she knew that she had
overstayed her welcome.
The UMC-TD ‘Lucky’ was three generations old and had made thirty eight
previous transits. As it alerted its three man crew of its imminent structural
compromise it took about it a radiant hue of amber and gold. Within 640
milliseconds the superstructure of the 154 meter long craft had folded in on
itself countless times. Grimnes would never dream again.
Twenty years earlier she found survival easier to come by. Darting about
the slums of New Manchester Aatrand found friends a plenty and delighted in
unfound places. Father stood angrily eating his meal at midday. Mother worked
bitterly in an administration role, somewhere in the hospital. School was
general procession of tedium and fear. Aastrand hid as best she could during
her education but failed to conceal her talents from Mr Dunn, her elementary
mathematics teacher. Dunn pegged her immediately for a career in the United
Mars Corporation. Talent was rare since the grand exposure.
She might have thought that her future was hers. Grimnes was always
shocked at the good fortune and opportunity that life had dealt her. She
thought this way almost until the moment she died.
Richard shook sleep away like a dead man chasing ants. Auditory and
visual alarms blazed around his inert form. He hit the alarm reset button.
Seventeen times. Arising he took the most cursory of ablutions and dressed as
arrogantly as he could manage. Ship loss was quite usual, factored in even. The
name of the ship was remote, the cargo more so. Richard was anxious about the
poor understanding he had of the lost ship. “Wool, wood, people”. Staring at
the underground tunnel which he hoped to deliver him from his uncomfortable
reverie.
Grimnes lifted her left arm to hit the hat switch to her left isolating
the Forced Guidance Control System…
Richard’s very stupid and very handsome cat chose this moment to stand on
his head.
Amber warning, disable all non essential flight systems, all non
essential life support.
Cat kisses!
Richard wishes that he will be a small part of the space programme.
Arriving late to work he keeps his head down. Mars work.
Why so Paranoid?
So, first up Schizophrenia is a syndrome of psychosis.
Psychosis is a very broad term which covers a range of phenomenon which result
as a problem with ‘reality testing’. As said previously the symptoms of
this disorder are broadly lumped into ‘positive’ (things that are added in;
perceptual abnormalities, delusions) and ‘negative’ (things that are taken
away; poor motivation, blunting of affect). When people are ‘unwell’ they tend
to be experiencing predominantly positive symptoms. These can be highly
distressing and disruptive for the individual and may lead to hospitalisation.
When people are ‘well’ they experience less positive symptoms but may be very
disabled by negative symptoms. They may require a great deal of support as, for
example, they may not take care their food, finances or personal care.
The term paranoia in the psychiatric sense is used to describe
interpreting things around you as being related to yourself, i.e. having delusions
of self-reference. It may include thoughts of persecution but it does not refer
to them exclusively. So delusional thoughts of being monitored and tracked by a
shady government organisation which is bent on ruining you by framing you for
some heinous crime is a ‘paranoid’, but so too is holding the delusional belief
that you are on a special mission to stop terrorism and the strangers on the
bus are really fellow agents sending you subtle secret messages by holding
their telephones a certain way or glancing at you from time to time.
Delusions in general can either be primary or secondary.
Secondary delusions follow on from abnormal experiences. If you hear people
muttering through the walls, have an uncanny sense of being watched all the
time and feel threatened you may conclude that you are being spied on by people
who mean you harm. In these cases I find it striking how delusions are really
just a rational mind trying to make sense of highly abnormal experiences. These
delusions can become highly detailed and complex. They also tend to be very
representative of people’s social context. I’m lucky enough to own a copy of a
book called ‘Presumed Curable’ which is a set of case studies, accompanied by
photographic portraits, of patients admitted to Bethlem Hospital in the late 19th
century. Spies of the Kaiser, nobles and religious miracles abound. During the
latter half of the 20th century aliens and spacemen hounded our
psychotic patients. Now they are increasingly tormented on social media. It’s
fascinating how the content of delusional thought shifts over time and across
cultures whilst the underlying cognitive errors remain static. Primary
delusions are those which appear to just appear de novo without any other
apparent psychotic phenomenon driving them.
As to why. I’ve got no choice but to be even more
reductionist here that I already have been. First up: chemicals. Brain
chemicals, neurotransmitters. The neurochemical theories of Schizophrenia are
essentially exercises in reverse engineering. This has important implications
for proclamations about the aetiology of psychiatric illnesses but also should
not led us, in my view, to dismiss the utility of such drugs. The drugs used to
treat the positive symptoms of Schizophrenia are essentially dopamine blocking
agents. Dopamine is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in mammals. The
first ‘antipsychotic’ developed was Chlorpromazine. This was synthesised in the
first half of the 20th century on the back of another drug,
Promethazine, which had been developed as an antihistamine (I used to love to take this drug for sedation and its antihistamine properties, doubling or even tripleing the recommended dose unitl it gave me akathsia prompting me to be kicked out of bed - not good for morale) The sedative
effects quickly became apparent and these drugs were initially utilised for surgical
procedures. Soon they were given to psychotic patients and the effects appeared
dramatic to those using them. Remember that up until this point patients were
commonly treated (or rather ‘brought under proper control’) with ECT (a safe
and effective treatment to this day!), psychosurgery (neither safe nor
effective, barbarism), insulin coma therapy (utter madness), seclusion and
physical restraint. The dopamine hypothesis was born. Too much Dopamine made
you psychotic, blocking dopamine made Schizophrenics better, right?
The
evidence for this hypothesis is really shaky. People really do get better when
given antipsychotics (in terms of psychosis anyway) and we know these drugs
primarily block dopamine. We know that if you pump someone full of cocaine their dopamine levels increase and they can become psychotic. We know that if we
treat Parkinson’s patients with Levodopa (a dopamine precursor which is able to
cross the blood-brain barrier) they can become psychotic. Cerebro-spinal fluid
examination of psychotic patients shows homovanillic acid (a dopamine
metabolite) levels correlate with the severity
of psychosis but not with the psychosis
itself.
Ropey stuff indeed. Is it likely that the most complex know object
in the universe can malfunction? Yes. Is it likely that this is due to one
single chemical imbalance? I very much doubt it. Do antipsychotic drugs have
utility in the treatment of psychosis? Absolutely, but let us not kid ourselves
that we know why that might be. Other neurotransmitters, such as Glutamate,
have been the target of antipsychotic drug development but these avenues have
not born fruit. How might all this help us unlock paranoia? I personally don’t know enough to join the
dots other than to say that positive symptoms in Schizophrenia have been
related in functional MRI studies to disorders of the medial prefrontal cortex
(executive functioning, attention and theory of mind), amygdala (fear) and hippocampus/para-hippocampal
region (memory and spatial awareness) and that signalling problems in these
areas probably leads to changes in cognitive processes which end up looking,
phenotypically, like psychosis. I’m not trying to be a smart arse, throwing
around neuroanatomical jargon here, as my view is that this sort of stuff lends
us precious little understanding of what is happening and why.
The second way to approach this issue is to look at psychological
or cognitive errors. Liddle (1987) proposed three clinical syndromes of
Schizophrenia, one of which was that of ‘reality disturbance’. Liddle et al
found regional cerebral blood-flow correlates in the left medial temporal lobe
and cingulate cortex which led to impairments in an individual’s ability to
‘self-monitor’ and experience delusions and hallucinations. Think of it as the
system which ‘tells you’ that your internal monologue is just that, breaks.
Random intrusive thoughts become critical ‘third person’ auditory
hallucinations (he’s so stupid), thoughts about what you are doing become a
‘running commentary’ (he’s buttering his toast again), intrusive thoughts or
thoughts about genuine desires may become ‘command hallucinations’. This may
seem more related to the first point about chemicals at first but it is a
really important concept. The ability to appropriately self-monitor one’s own
thoughts, emotions and bodily sensations is vital if one is to properly make
sense of this information. The concepts of ‘self’ and ‘other’ break down in
psychosis. Some people speak of their minds becoming porous during psychotic
episodes. Humans are already seriously prone to magical thinking, attribution
errors and biases. If the areas of the brain which regulate an individual’s
ability to monitor their own internal experiences malfunctions and the ability
to accurately determine other people’s thoughts, emotions and intent go awry,
it seems logical to me that correlates are increasingly perceived as
causatives.
People tend to be a bit mad in any case,,
In the House of the Rising Sun
In my life I have listened to many people who really have nothing to say at all. You probably have too. Having nothing to say is, I will argue, something of a virtue. Having nothing to say tells the world that you have nothing to say. Having nothing to say de facto means that you have nothing to say.
This is very powerful for two reasons. Firstly, you have nothing to say. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, you have nothing to say. This behaviour should not be mistaken for saying nothing however, people tend to say things all the time. They might say that "giving players a jammed gun in DayZ is a social experiment" or "how to plan an active vacation". People say things all the time.
I have nothing to say.
Also I did not argue my point as I had nothing to say on the matter.
1. Premise
2. Bollocks
3. ????
4. VIRTUE!
This is very powerful for two reasons. Firstly, you have nothing to say. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, you have nothing to say. This behaviour should not be mistaken for saying nothing however, people tend to say things all the time. They might say that "giving players a jammed gun in DayZ is a social experiment" or "how to plan an active vacation". People say things all the time.
I have nothing to say.
Also I did not argue my point as I had nothing to say on the matter.
1. Premise
2. Bollocks
3. ????
4. VIRTUE!
Friday, 6 December 2013
Eventually Ian Stewart Brady
In
1963, Dallas, Texas, a bullet smashed through the skull of the then
president of the united states of America. Two other potentially fatal
wounds were also inflicted, to his thorax and neck. He died. That
description might seems too passive in a way – rather he was killed,
murdered or assassinated. This is not insignificant. Here is a man who
has reached the highest office in the so called free world, which one
would imagine on it's own would make him an excellent target for
killing, and is killed. A man who lied and adulterated throughout his
term and presumably before hand also. Yet he is heralded as an Icon. He
was unquestionably extremely charismatic. He orated well and made
proclamations of peace, a better understanding between people and of
hope. But he died. Perhaps he meant well. I very much doubt it though. I
see a privileged, randy, cold war politician who made no significant
changes to the society his administration governed. He gave the 'okay'
to the Bay of Pigs invasion, recovered admirably, and repented by
escalating the war in Vietnam. He also committed a great deal of thought
and money to putting people on the Moon, which though inspirational at
the time might be judged contrived and wasteful by our standards. Then
he caught a bullet in the brain and became an immortal. JFK was taken
from us only for the evil Nixon to fill the void. So the narrative goes.
Narrative history appears to describe a really unhelpful account of
events to my mind. It misses the truth. It is primarily disseminated by
mass media and consumed by a mass audience and as such there should be a
sufficient degree of responsibility and integrity to the truth. There
generally is not, rather there appears to be a desire to craft some
crude dichotomy or other. I find this lazy and insulting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)