The
incorrigible fire topped news papers and supposedly more thoughtful
broadsheets appear to have united in an interesting way this week.
Pisses me off and I thought for a full 90 seconds about how I thought
about and wanted to put this, which hurt my brain , but it goes
something like this:
“That
weird pervert murdered his children because he was on too many
benefits”
The
Telegraph, the fat twats that they are, constructed a better sentence
and put it more subtly:
“The
UK now has seven social classes, according to a BBC survey. At the
bottom is what they call the “precariat” – the poor, precarious
proletariat. Well, they need to come up with an eighth category for
Mick Philpott”
The
loveable Daily Mail put it more succinctly, less afraid of being seen
as the fascist bastards that they are:
“Something
has gone awry when skivers like Mick Philpott feel all-powerful and
society cannot summon the moral will to say 'No. Enough.'”
Mick
Philpott seems to me to have become the poster boy of what is wrong
with the welfare state in the context of Osbourne's recent budget
review. I'm not going to continue fucking newspaper quotes on here to
back up my argument, you have the internet, or are alive and have
seen the news, so have a look yourself. I'm going for more drink.
It's meant to be a present and I shouldn't drink it or something but
fuck it. Someone will back me up if it comes to it. Maybe we could
set the house on fire and blame it on somebody else? No?
There are
about 300,000 people on waiting lists for social housing. The BBC and
ONS are telling me something stupid like 7.7% of the population is
unemployed. My calculator tells me that that's about 5 million
people. Probably can't be right. I've met many people who claim
benefits, a lot of them skivers. Lazy, entitled mother fuckers who
refuse to accept any responsibility for what they do or what happens
to them. They tend to stand out because they piss you off the most.
They've usually come from economically poor backgrounds, have been
abused in one way or another well before the age of ten, use drugs
and alcohol to excess in their early teens, 'come into contact with
services' by their mid teens and end up being a 'problem' to
services and society by the time they are reaching twenty. If this
behaviour continues the boys are more likely to go to prison and the
girls are more likely to end up in 'psychiatric care'. Lots of angry
people. Not one of them has set their house on fire and
'accidentally' killed six children though.
I don't
really give a flying fuck about the BBC's new class system or
anything else. The three stratum model seems to works fine.
Apparently I'm ' established middle class', which is really nice.
Apparently I'm the second richest person in Britain and should invest
in Fabergé
Dildos.
I know
sweet fuck all about economics and sociology but I know a psychopath
when I see one. Your man Philpott is one. Any they don't need to be
on benefits to be heinous. But to Philcott.
Glibness/
superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self worth
Parasitic lifestyle
Promiscuous sexual behavior
Many short-term (marital) relationships
Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
Poor behavioral control
Irresponsibility
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/02/derby-house-fire-evil-philpotts
Early behavior problems
Criminal versatility
Psychopathy is hardly scientific whatever Hare and his qaucks tell you. This man is a psychopath, not a product of some sort of coruppt society. I prefer to call them cunts. Whatever classification system you use, mine or his, this is one though.
This
man is a psychopath, not a product of some sort of 'too soft'
society. He walks amongst you and you probably respect him. There are
no good figures, but it might be as high as 1%, which is a lot. He's
the one that seems to win and lords it over you and you're too afraid
to challenge him, not because he's going to hurt you necessarily, but
because he frightens you in some way. Most of them have found
positions of power, be it some your boss, MP or doctor. They don't
like to be uncomfortable, just like you, but often look for
advantages you wouldn't. Stop being a coward. Get yourself some
Machiavellian egocentricity going. It's very unlikely that he will
set your house on fire.
No.
Enough.
